Anglican and United churches discuss differences
Members of the dialogue gathered at the Vancouver School of Theology in January. Front row (l to r): Gail Allan, Paula Sampson, Sandra Beardsall, Stephen Silverthorne. Back row (l to r): Andrew O’Neill, Gordon Jensen, Donald Koots, Bruce Myers, Elisabeth Jones, Lynne McNaughton, William Harrison. Photo: Glenn Sawatzky
“Both friendly and intense”—that’s how the Rev. William Harrison describes the latest phase of the dialogue between representatives of the Anglican Church of Canada and the United Church of Canada after the last of three annual meetings wrapped up at the Vancouver School of Theology on Jan. 16.
Harrison, the group’s Anglican co-chair, said the participants from both churches have prepared an interim report, which has to be submitted the Anglican Church of Canada’s Council of General Synod (CoGS) for its next meeting in May before it can be discussed in detail. In the meanwhile, he answered a few questions from the Journal by email about the latest meetings and their progress.
In keeping with a resolution from the 2010 General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada, and with the agreement of the United Church’s Theology and Inter-Church Inter-Faith Committee, these most recent talks have focused on “the doctrinal identities of the two churches and the implications of this for the lives of the churches—including understandings of sacraments and orders of ministry.”
“Both sides have been willing to engage and ask tough questions,” Harrison wrote. “Where the previous phase focused on what we have in common, this phase has been more inclined to recognize differences. The result is that we have challenged one another and ourselves.” The previous dialogue took place over six years and ended in 2009. Those conversations were described in Drawing from the Same Well: The St. Brigid Report.
In spite of those differences, Harrison wrote, “We found that on core theological commitments (as expressed in the Nicene and Apostles’ Creeds, for example) we are really in much the same place, facing common challenges. Our differences on these matters tend to be more in the realm of how we do theology than in the things that we affirm.”
When asked about what might come next in the dialogue, Harrison pointed to the theology of ordination. Questions that could be considered include, “How similar/different are our understandings of ordained ministry? What does the ordination rite accomplish? What is the work of the ordained? What is their place in the life of the church?”
Harrison mentioned the discussion of eucharistic prayers as a high point for him, personally. “As an Anglican, I am vividly aware of the difference between our tradition that insists upon communally-authorized liturgies and the United tradition that gives the presider freedom to compose a liturgy.” He said he was “pleased and surprised” when a United Church member pointed out the instructions for creating a eucharistic prayer in a United Church worship resource. “The instructions include all of the elements of a eucharistic prayer as we understand and expect such a prayer,” Harrison said.
Harrison noted that there is overlap between the two denominations. “Some Anglicans sound more United, while some United Church members sound quite Anglican.”
Conversations with the United Church of Canada have been approached with particular delicacy because of the history of its relationship with the Anglican Church of Canada. In 1975, a plan for formally uniting the two churches that had been discussed since the 1950s was in its final stages. Some congregations had merged their ministries. The plan had been approved by the United Church’s General Council when it was rejected by the Anglican Church of Canada’s General Synod. “There were especially bad feelings, I think, on the United Church side, of disappointment, being caught by surprise, being led down the garden path, left at the altar,” explained Archdeacon Bruce Myers, co-ordinator for ecumenical and interfaith relations for the Anglican Church of Canada, mentioning some of the metaphors that have been used to describe the situation over the years.
Though some talks regarding shared ministries continued for a few years, the churches agreed to set aside discussions for a time, though they worked together collaboratively in the peace and justice coalitions that eventually became Kairos and through organizations such as the Canadian Council of Churches and the World Council of Churches, Myers said. In 2003, the Anglican church reached out to the United Church and they began a new ecumenical dialogue.
The members of the dialogue are:
Anglican Church of Canada
• The Rev. Dr. William Harrison (co-chair—diocese of Kootenay)
• The Rev. Dr. Gordon Jensen (ELCIC—Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon)
• The Ven. Dr. Lynne McNaughton (diocese of New Westminster)
• The Rev. Dr. Paula Sampson (Vancouver School of Theology)
• The Rev. Stephen Silverthorne (diocese of Ottawa)
• The Ven. Bruce Myers (General Synod staff)
United Church of Canada
• The Rev. Dr. Andrew O’Neill (co-chair)
• The Rev. Dr. Sandra Beardsall
• The Rev. Alf Dumont (unable to attend this most recent meeting)
• The Rev. Elisabeth Jones
• The Rev. Donald Koots
• Dr. Gail Allan (staff)
Anglican Journal News, February 18, 2014